Betrayal, The Climate Engineering Cover-Up By The Media, The US Military, And Academia
Our society is taught and conditioned to accept the dictates and
opinions of the so called "experts" without questioning their
conclusions. In so many circles of academia honesty and morality has
long since been abandoned in exchange for a paycheck and a pension. When
one branch or group of the science community completely contradicts
another group from the same field of study, shouldn't that be a glaring
red flag? Nowhere do we have a more egregious and criminally negligent
example than with the climate science community's complete denial of the
climate engineering issue and its overall effect on the planetary
thermostat. While the vast majority of climatologists/scientists and
governments around the globe are either "investigating" or pushing for
global geoengineering/solar radiation management to be deployed for
global warming "mitigation" (as if geoengineering has not been going on
for over 70 years already), other camps in the science community have
long since confirmed that jet traffic and "contrails" (sprayed
particulate trails) are actually a major contributor to global warming. A
dozen sample articles are below which confirm the overall warming
effect that is caused from jet aircraft traffic and "contrails".
"Aircraft
contrails may be causing more climate warming today than all the carbon
dioxide emitted by aircraft since the start of aviation" (Think Progress)
"ScienceShot: Jet Contrails a Big Global Warmer" (Science magazine)
"Airplane contrails and their effect on temperatures" (Christian Science Monitor)
"The Contrail Effect" (From NOVA and PBS)
"Jet Contrails Actually Do Alter The Weather" ( Discovery Magazine)
"Flying Further To Avoid Jet Contrails Might Help With Global Warming" (Popular Science)
"Airplane Contrails Boost Global Warming" (National Geographic)
But are we really witnessing "contrails" in our skies? Can "contrails" be turned on and off? No.
ALL commercial jet aircraft and ALL military tankers are fitted with
"high bypass turbofan jet engines", does this type of prolusion system
typically produce any "condensation" trails? No again.
The grand deception is this, all available data proves beyond reasonable
doubt that the trails being used to blot out the sun and alter the
weather around the globe are intentionally sprayed (and highly toxic)
particulate trails that are the direct result of ongoing covert climate engineering programs. The closest the climate science community has come to telling the truth is to admit that "contrails" may be causing "accidental" geoengineering. How
is it possible that we live in a "civilized world" in which such
massive, obvious, and unimaginably destructive programs can be carried
out in plain site while the climate science community (and academia as whole) adamantly and criminally denies this verifiable reality?
The quote below from climate scientist, Sarah Myhre, sheds some light
on the mindset of many in academia (though still, of course, omits the
issues of geoengineering/solar radiation management).
We scientists are the gatekeepers of the basic information that fuels decision making by nations, businesses and communities. As these public entities are more and more threatened by the advancing impacts of climate warming, from flooding, to water scarcity, to the spread of tropical diseases, our role as objective scientists has to change. We are so skilled at many, many detailed and quantitative tasks, but, as you would expect from a community of introverts, we are not great at shining that brilliant light back on ourselves.
(Sarah Myhre is an ocean and climate scientist with expertise in the marine ecological consequences of abrupt climate warming.)
How bad is the true state of the global climate? As dire as the recent article excerpt at the link below may seem, the unfolding reality on the ground is far worse and global climate engineering is helping to fuel the overall fire.
No comments:
Post a Comment