True Cellular Detox and Healing

5R’s of True Cellular Detox and Healing

In this day and age, as toxins pile up in our environment and we are exposed to an unimaginable avalanche of chemicals, EMF’s, food additives, GMO’s and the like, many of us are facing health challenges that are unexplainable. We go from doctor to doctor, searching for answers to relieve our many uncomfortable symptoms, only to be handed a prescription for medication, or to be told that there is nothing array. What is going wrong?

Having faced my own serious health crisis, I came to realize that the only way out of the maze of these “new millennium diseases” is what I call TRUE CELLULAR HEALING. When I was ill, many of the doctors I contacted couldn't explain what was wrong with me and that was devastating. I realized that by understanding the workings of my disease process, it empowered ME to take responsibility and seek out the information I needed to unwind the mess that existed at the cellular level. We must educate ourselves and understand what is at the root cause of our illness. We must understand what is going wrong at the cellular level and become educated on “cellular failure”. Remember: education is power.

That being said, we need a roadmap to a new paradigm of healing. I have labeled mine the 5R’s OF CELLULAR DETOXIFICATION AND REGENERATION. Although I don’t expect you to become your own doctor (that is my job), I want you to understand these principles of healing. When I was gravely ill, this knowledge gave me hope because it not only explained how I got so sick, but how my body could heal itself if I followed these steps.

Remove the Source – We need to determine which toxic sources (heavy metals, biotoxins, environmental toxins and/or toxins inside your home) are causing body-wide damage. When identified, these sources can then be safely ushered out of the body using my crafted protocols.

Regenerate the Cell membrane – In healthy individuals, the supple bi-lipid fat layer of the cellular membrane allows both nutrients to flow inside easily and toxins and free radicals inside the cell to leave unimpeded. If inflamed, nothing can come in and nothing can come out, so our cell becomes a toxic wasteland. Inflammation can also compromise our cell’s ability to function properly and truncates our ability to “hear” the hormonal impressions through the hormone receptors that reside on the outside of the cellular membrane.

Restore Cellular Energy – As nutrients flow into the cell, they feed the powerhouse called the mitochondria, which produces ATP (energy). Without adequate production of ATP, our cells are unable to detoxify or regenerate properly.

Reduce Inflammation – (no/onno cycle) – Toxic inflammation is produced from 3 main sources: over consumption refined sugar and grains, bad fats and toxins from food sources, cosmetics, air pollution, toxic cleaning products and more. Needless to say, inflammation and oxidative stress can wreak havoc and is at the root cause of all disease processes that we see in our office.

Reestablish Methylation – Because the body needs methyl groups to turn stress hormones on and off, if depleted, our body stays in a constant state of stress. In addition, if our methyl groups are non-existent or in short supply, the important roles they play in detoxification, DNA protection, hormone metabolism and epigenetics are unable to be performed.

Who is the Government?

What is most important to you?

For many people it would be {faith, family, friends} things which bring joy or truthful meanings...

Yet most people dream, scheme or plan of things which would seem to improve their life...
 The key to the things or stuff which most people think they want is money or the medium of exchange!  So how does this happen?

One of the most important that can be done is for a nation is to provide the citizens with a economic system that allows jobs and a productive financial climate... Yet both of these are not present in the USA today!

We should ask our Liberal -  Democrat friends to learn to understand  that it is very difficult to be both both " Pro Job " and " Anti-Business " at the same time!    It like being  " pro-egg " and " anti- chicken " - it does not work;  because it is not possible - period!

For a country to succeed - There is a need for people to be free to start and run business on their own ideas and ways...  This requires the Gov't to provide just a limited oversight and direction - but not get into the day to day decisions of when, why and how ....  Very limited control...

Because few of the American people actually have the desire, drive or ability to grow a business...
This is what drives the economy - not the Government  * because the Gov't does not make anything or really generate income or revenue {BTW taxes are negative income and counter real production}.
When you take taxes from the working - producing section of the economy it is a subtraction from the total economic base of the country!

Therefore government support cost (subtracts from) the country real money or expenditure!

The resulting government programs drain money from the productive section of the economy of the nation!   ***  This some what like having a personal checking account - your deposits add to the balance  and any expenditures or withdrawals are negative  or subtract...   In a personal account you must keep the balance in the positive area or and actually have funds available!   A Negative balance is money you do not have and requires some form repayment!  Debt!  

Yet our Federal government has been running on empty for going on fifty years - thus just kicking the debt can down the road!  This is lie borrowing money from a dead man...
It place the debt settlement upon future generations  - who will have their own costs to deal with ... So this is false and unfair way to do operate the government!

=================================================

Any other way to look at this is justification to rob - steal from future generations...

Wrong is and has, and will always be wrong no matter how well you defend or make it look better...

The key is to live the truth -
    that is to stop pretending that borrowing without any provision of repayment is OKAY!

THERE 4 WAYS TO FIGHT IDEOLOGY

 THERE 4 WAYS TO FIGHT THE IDEOLOGY OF ez-lamb:

First, the fall of Nazi Germany and the USSR destroyed the ideal embodiments of Nazism and Communism. Neither ideology has ever really recovered from that, and the number of their adherents dropped sharply and have mostly channeled their energies into empty grandstanding or into working from inside the political system to seize power.

 ez-lamb has not suffered a similar defeat for nearly a century. For the Shiites, the fall of Iran might have server a similar function. For the Sunnis, no standing country embodies those virtues. The Taliban came closest, and for as long as the Taliban continue to fight, the idea of an ongoing struggle persists. Like Communism and Nazism, ez-labism's adherents have also moved into working from within the system, but only as a twin to an armed strategy.

Secondly, Islam is to non-muz-limb religions what Nazism and Communism was to Jews. The Jews had no place within an ideal Nazi or Communist state, the Nazi Final Solution depended on physical eradication, the Communist Final Solution on cultural eradication.

Similarly non-Muslim religions should have no place within an ideal Islamist state. This means that in majority non-muz-limb countries, muz-limbs cannot plot political takeovers as Nazis and Communists can. They can work within the system, but only for so long since the endgame is to force everyone to live under muz-limbs laws. And this cannot be done without a great deal of violence.

Terrorism is a cheap way for a muz-lim minority to try and enforce its will on a muz-limb majority. It also allows for a game of "Bad muz-limb- Good muz-limbs", in which the Bad Muz-limbs set off bombs on buses, while the Good Muz-limbs work with the government to "defuse extremism" by teaching the authorities to slowly accommodate muz-limb demands.

Thirdly, while Communism and Nazism were urban industrial ideologies developed by Western intellectuals with the intention of creating industrialized superstates, Islam is pre-industrial and tribal. While the final Islamic goal may be a global Caliphate, the military tactics favor updated versions of nomadic raids, the key form of warfare by the Taliban, and internal infiltration in urban areas. When Nazism and Communism's superstates collapsed, the implementation of their ideology collapsed as well. Islam however is tribal and Islamism can be implemented in a handful of villages, as the Taliban demonstrated.

Fourthly, ez-lamb is religious, and political religion exists at a much deeper cultural level than any secular political ideology can. Where political ideologies need a political structure to control or plot control of, ez-lamb can remain dormant with only mosques and qurans to perpetuate itself, like insects hibernating in winter, before emerging in spring bent on conquest again. Religion is taught universally and functions as the fabric of a community, beyond question, and participation in which is the price of communal membership.

Now let's look at what all these mean. The first, third and fourth conditions mean that ezlamb is far more decentralized, which in turn makes it much harder to suppress or destroy. The fourth condition means that as a religion it is deeply embedded, it is part of the structure of cultures and communities. The second condition means that ez-lamb in non-muz-limb countries must inevitably turn to violence as both a military and political tactic. What does all that tell us about winning the War on Terror?

It means that ez-lamb has to be fought not just on a military level, but on a political and cultural level. Deizlamization has to be the guiding approach abroad, and especially at home. ez-lamb's cultural roots mean that it has to be resisted and uprooted at a cultural level. Bombing terrorist bases while leaving intact the Madrassas which educate and create a new generation of terrorists is a senseless waste of time that will accomplish nothing. Promoting Deislamization abroad, while throwing the Mosque gates open at home, only ushers in a new wave of terror at home.

For the War on Terror to count for anything, it must be a War on ex-lamb, because ez-lamb is the guiding ideology behind terrorism. Rooting out terrorism without rooting out Islam, only painfully prolongs the struggle. A number of European countries have concluded exactly that, and decided that surrendering to ex-lamb will spare them effort and pain. That is not a choice I can support, but it is at least a choice made based on an understanding of the problem. By contrast pretending that we can fight a War on Terror without fighting a War on ez-lamb is simply wishful thinking.

Fighting a War on ez-lamb means making a careful study of the structures and ways in which ez-lamb is sustained and promoted, particularly on higher education for muz-limbs religious scholars and on the ways in which the dilettante sons of wealthy muz-limb families become entangled in such projects. The muz-limb religious school trains the terrorists of tomorrow and imbues them with dreams of creating a new ez-lamic reality.

The boys and men who study in them and then go on to higher learning as Imams and Mullahs, form the core of ez-lamik terrorist ideology. The Mosque serves as the base for any mu-zlamb community, particularly abroad where the muz-limb preacher can incite violence. The Koran serves as the manual for terrorism in the name of an ideal Islamic world order. In order of importance, these are the real commanders and bases of the enemy.

To the extent that they are pushed back, weakened, uprooted or destroyed-- we will have peace. To the extent that they prosper and spread, we will have nothing but war.

The Future of the War on Terror is a MUST be a War on Islam, because ezlamb has declared war on us. The debates over tactics in Afghanistan ignore the large reality that the Taliban are not an isolated phenomenon, they are what expanding ez-lamb will always produce. While we chop away at the branches, the seeds of terror grow in our own soil waiting to sprout. {Such truth is here}

The War against ex-lamb will have to be fought more on a cultural and political level, than on a military level, because that is where the roots dig deep into the rotten soil. That will require a whole other kind of global alliance, an alliance of cultures and religions threatened by ex-lamb, around the world. It will require cooperation between Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Hindus and many others as well. It will involve distributing the truth about ez-lamb, countering ez-lamik's political gains with strong anti-muz-limb activist coalitions and shutting ez-lamik organizations out of the political process and away from their attempts at mainstreaming ez-lamb.

 Much of this is already underway today. But far beyond that it will require deporting Imams who preach anything but good citizenship, shuttering mosques and madrassas and halting and even reversing ez-lamik immigration.

On a military level, we will have to make it clear that any muzl-imb terrorist attack will result in utter devastation for the source countries involved. muz-limb terrorists can kill thousands, but we can kill a thousand times that. And the sooner we make it clear that WE WILL with ruthless force, the less likely it is that we will face a situation where we have to.
 ** But BO has cut back on the number of nuclear weapons and is still having then destroyer!}

 Nation building may have a role where the conditions are favorable to the rise and rule of secular authorities, but if we have the courage, deterrence through destruction is a better use of our resources, than deterrence through backing puppet regimes that could not survive without our troops to protect them.

We know who the enemy is.

 It is not simply the terrorists lurking at their base camps, it is the cleric in Al Azhar University who signs off on a Fatwa that legitimizes murdering our people. That cleric is a much better target than the terrorists, because the cleric provides the ideology that creates ez-lamik terrorism in the first place.
 If we are to use "Smart Strikes", than let us be really smart about it by making sure that we do not waste time striking at a tentacle of the octopus, when we can strike at the head instead.

The War on Terror will not end by entering a bunker and finding the "Leader of Terrorism" dead. ez-lamik terrorism has no leader, it has motivation. Breaking ez-lamb of its enthusiasm for power and expansionism is the only way we will win.

Victory is possible. The only question is do we want it badly enough.

The US needs to stop BO and kick out all the Mooslim immigrants who will bring Sharia Law and destruction to the United States.. 

A great story of a past happening

So true... how and why do some politicians think that they can give away our money to people we would not...

Who you give money or anything else to should be your choice alone!

Get Government Out of Charity Business + List of Senators FOR O-Amnesty!

When Tennessee frontiersman Davy Crockett served in the US Congress (between 1827 and 1835) he voted for a bill appropriating $20,000 for relief for victims of a fire that broke out in Georgetown. When he returned home, a constituent farmer chastised him for supporting the bill and for “giving what is not yours to give.” The farmer told Crockett the constitution does not grant Congress the power to give charity and if it did, “You will very easily perceive what a wide door this would open for fraud and favoritism and corruption, on the one hand, and robbing the people on the other.”

We are far from those days. Supreme Court decisions over the years have opened the door for rationalizing just about anything under the spending authority of the Congress.

Those who crafted the American constitution did not intend limitations on the federal government’s role out of mean spiritedness. They did so out of a sense of what would best serve the public.
It stands to reason that bureaucrats spending other people’s money - funds taken by force - is not going to produce good results.

According to a 2012 Congressional Research Service report, and the staff of Senator Jeff Sessions (R-Ala), who commissioned the report, combined annual federal and state spending on antipoverty programs exceeds $ 1 trillion. About 75 percent comes from the federal government.

These funds, which include programs such as welfare, food stamps, low-income housing programs, child care assistance, etc. are programs that mostly came onto the American scene with the War on Poverty and, in that they are focused on helping the less fortunate, are what it is usually considered charity.
These programs are notoriously wasteful and are too often counterproductive and motivated by political gain rather than genuine sincerity to really help people.

Funds extracted from taxpayers, dispensed by bureaucrats, under rules and conditions designed by other bureaucrats, remove personal responsibility from both the giving and receiving ends of the equation.
In addition to waste, unintended consequences of this social engineering has produced government dependence, family breakdown, and removal of the sense on the part of recipients that they bear responsibility for their own lives.

As government expands, private resources are squeezed out.

While government spends a trillion dollars annually on antipoverty programs, total private charity in the US in 2013, according to Giving USA, was about a third of this - $335 billion. And much of this, contributions to universities, museums, etc., doesn’t go to causes we normally think of as charity.

There are initiatives to come up with ways to spend government funds more efficiently. Congressman Paul Ryan and Senator Patty Murray have introduced legislation to create a commission to better “use data to evaluate the effectiveness of federal programs and tax expenditures.”

A new book by Brookings Institution scholars Ron Haskins and Greg Margolis, “Show Me the Evidence,” reviews “evidence-based” strategies for what works as a precondition for federal funding of programs.
But why focus on trying to make government more efficient rather than on what government should or should not do?

I run a non-profit and I know what it means to deliver results in order to satisfy donors and raise funds. It is no different than any commercial enterprise.
In my column last week, I proposed 5 conservative reforms to help low income communities transition off destructive government dependence. One idea is dollar for dollar tax credits for private charitable contributions going to designated low-income zip codes.

Can there be any doubt if a trillion dollars in private giving was going to low –income America, rather government money, everyone would be better off?

Rather than trying to fix government, let’s put it back in its constitutional place and restore private decision-making and responsibility to American life.

-Townhall . com - December 15th., 2014 by Star Parker

Commets:

If you gave me $100,000 and told me to “help the poor” what would you expect me to do?
What if, at the end of the year, you asked me what i did with the money I told you “I gave $30,000 to a poor family and kept $70,000 for myself to ‘manage the program’”?

And by ‘manage the program’ I mean I let them poor family buy lobster for their dog, and spent the money in strip clubs and on big-screen TV’s., buy 4 cases of water to spill on the ground so they can collect the bottle deposit and buy cigarettes?

You would be furious, and rightly so.

So why is no one upset when the government does the exact same thing with Welfare?
__________________________________________________________
List of Republican Senators Voting For Obama's Exec. Amnesty Order (RINOs):
__________________________________________________________
Alexander (R-TN) Ayotte (R-NH) Barrasso (R-WY) Coats (R-IN) Cochran (R-MS) Collins (R-ME) Corker (R-TN) Cornyn (R-TX) Enzi (R-WY) Flake (R-AZ) Graham (R-SC) Hatch (R-UT) Heller (R-NV) Johnson (R-WI) Kirk (R-IL) McCain (R-AZ) McConnell (R-KY) Murkowski (R-AK) Toomey (R-PA) Wicker (R-MS)

Not Voting: Chambliss (R-GA) Coburn (R-OK) -Excerpt. More at: senate . gov

Birth Trauma & Chiropractic

Birth Trauma & Chiropractic

Science is now starting to document something chiropractors have been observing and warning about for years.  For decades chiropractors have been warning the public of the danger to newborns from the currently common birth processes used today.  Birth is a natural phenomenon that should not be viewed or treated as a medical condition.  

However, in an attempt to “manage” the birth process, many problems are created.

The most prevalent danger chiropractors have been warning about when it comes to the birth process is the creation of subluxations.  Numerous articles and symposiums have relayed scientific documentation of damage that occurs to the nervous system in the neck of newborns during the common birth process.  This damage ranges from mild subluxations in the upper neck to more serious subluxations involving spinal cord damage and central nervous system problems.

Many authorities suggest that the position of the mother coupled with the pulling from the delivering physician has a lot to do with the creation of these subluxation related problems.  When the delivering mother is lying on her back she is not only working partially against gravity but she has reduced the pelvic opening size.  These two factors then require the attending physician to pull harder on the head of the child.  

This increased pulling and twisting during the birth process, coupled with a decrease in the pelvic opening and a non alignment with gravity often set the stage for birth trauma, subluxation and the resulting problems.

Health consequences to the newborn from birth trauma range from immediate and severe to hidden problems that may take years to surface.  Some of the more immediate and tragic results that have been documented are spinal cord and brain stem injuries, brain bleeding and swelling, neurological deficits, breathing problems and even sudden infant death syndrome.

The long-term consequences are as varied as the nerve system itself.  Some of the more commonly mentioned problems that have been linked to traumatic birth are learning disabilities, headaches, visual and hearing problems, certain palsies, and a host of immune functional problems.

Experts are suggesting that birth be handled as a normal and natural process.  Many experts suggest the birthing position of choice is in an upright position of either sitting or squatting.  The less force used, if any, the better.  Chiropractors have been stressing for years the importance of having a newborn checked for vertebral subluxations.  The importance of a developing child being free from nerve interference from subluxation can not be understated.

Episiotomy confers no benefits

Posted on:

Wednesday, December 10th 2014 at 11:30 am

Written By:

Judy Cohain, CNM

Episiotomy confers no benefits. The most effective way to prevent perineal damage is to avoid episiotomy. Episiotomy, albeit rarely, has resulted in the death of the woman from necrotizing fasciitis.
Episiotomy increases all the bad outcomes it was supposed to prevent. In a 1983 review of episiotomy during the years 1860-1980, this review found that episiotomy has no benefits and causes more 3rd and 4th degree tears, more short and long term fecal incontinence, more bleeding, more pain, and more short and long term sexual discomfort than not cutting an episiotomy. (1)
Most fecal incontinence is a result of damage caused by an episiotomy. (2)  A previous episiotomy is the biggest risk factor for perineal damage on subsequent births - 55% of women who had previously had an episiotomy needed to be sutured at subsequent births. (3)
The World Health Organization recommends episiotomy for the following indications only, but none of them are backed up by evidence:

1. Fetal distress in the second stage of labor, to speed up the delivery of the baby - The truth is that episiotomy is not performed until the head is crowning and about to emerge because before that it would result in life threatening postpartum hemorrhage.  True fetal distress does not develop suddenly in the last 5 minutes as the head is about to emerge. The fetal heart may go down while the mother holds her breath to push.  If the baby has had a reassuring heart beat until crowning, there is plenty of time for the fetus to recover a normal heart beat between contractions, by encouraging the woman to breathe normally.
2. Previous third or fourth degree tear - The opposite is true. Episiotomy increases anal damage. (2) Women with previous severe tear can prevent repeat tears by stretching the scar tissue with EPINO birth trainer before birth.
3. Complicated vaginal delivery, e.g. shoulder dystocia, breech, forceps or vacuum deliveries - No evidence for this. An episiotomy just makes a lot of bleeding so you cannot see what you are doing with shoulder dystocia, breech, forceps and vacuum births.  Delivery of the head is not delayed by the perineum, but by the pelvic bones, so cutting an episiotomy does not speed up the birth and may delay it because of the bloody mess.
4. Maternal stress due to exhaustion or heart failure - Think about it.  The woman carried the baby for 9 months and went thru hours of labor, but suddenly WHO justifies making a deep cut to save 5 minutes?  She will push for an extra 5 minutes if you just tell her that it will prevent 10 days of pain from an episiotomy and a 1% risk of permanent incontinence of feces.
5. A very tight perineum that prevents delivery - Where the fetal heart is reassuring there is no rush.  The perineum will stretch eventually if one waits patiently.

   ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

  *** Does this make any of you feel better???
 

a Democratic Republic

Our forefathers wanted to create a Democratic Republic where the people were free to govern themselves. As Abraham Lincoln put it a "Government by the people, of the people, and for the people." They created a government where the majority rule. A majority of the people voting elect senators, house representatives, judges, the president and the vice president. In the legislative branch the majority vote in bills to become law. This concept of majority rule is a founding cornerstone of our form of government. The signers of the Constitution did not want the rule of any tyrannical despot King, to make life miserable for the population. The American Civil Liberty Union (ACLU) often champions the rights of minority groups or individuals. In any society the rights of all individuals need to be protected from unjust abuse. This is a noble and just cause for any group to undertake. However, a problem occurs when the ACLU wins cases that force the "will" or viewpoint of a minority onto the will of the majority. In so doing, the ACLU uses the judicial branch of the government to undermine the rights of the majority, and thus to undermine the very foundations of our democracy, namely majority rule. When courts continuously side with a minority they create a society where the minority gain power over the majority, thus becoming the tyranny of the minority .  This is just the opposite of a democracy. The courts should always be aware that the majority have rights also , no less important then the rights of the minority. If rulings cannot be made that accommodate both sides in such cases, but rather always favor the minority view then this country will be in grave danger of fragmenting into small groups trying to gain power through the court system rather then through the ballot box. One can only wonder after the Supreme Court decided the Presidential election of 2000, where this will lead the country? This is not a good trend for a democracy. The ACLU and the Citizens United for the Separation of Church and State are on a quest to remove any mention of God from our public society. After the 9-11 terrorist attack in New York City, people around the country started posting signs which read, "God Bless America." The ACLU has taken a school in California, to court for posting such a sign.  The ACLU is claiming that this is a violation of the Church and State principle in our Constitution. (You should now realize that their is no such clause in the Constitution.) They also want to eliminate the National Motto, "In God We Trust", and eliminate the motto from our money. It follows that they would then want to eliminate the phrase in the Presidents Oath of office "so help me God." The words "One Nation Under God" have come before the Supreme Court in the " Pledge of Allegiance " case.   The ACLU has sued the Alabama Chief Justice for displaying a copy of the "Ten Commandments " in the state court house, and the monument was removed in August 2003. The ACLU, and the People for the American Way, and others have been outraged that a Christian and vigilant defender of the U.S. Constitution, like Attorney General John Ashcroft, could be named as the head of the Department of Justice and have filed law suits against the Justice Department for deporting aliens that are in this country illegally some of whom may be terrorist or supporting terrorist.  Read Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points Memo on the ACLU secularist movement. "If you oppose God, you oppose America." John Witherspoon signer of the Declaration of Independence & President of Princeton College.

Last Update Jan. 2009   

Death has lost it's power

Death has lost it's power

*** The resurrection of Jesus is the ultimate proof of the accuracy of His doctrine. ***
Date:   12/12/2014 10:29:15

December 12th


DEATH HAS LOST ITS POWER


"And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose,"
MATTHEW 27:52

This is an amazing event that only Matthew records. This earthquake apparently rolled the stones away from many of the graves in the vicinity of Jerusalem, and some of the saints buried there arose from the dead. Even at the death of Jesus, such power was released that death lost its grip on its captives.

It is uncertain whether these resurrected saints died again or were caught up to God. If they were resurrected at Christ's death, then they would have had to die again, just as Lazarus or Jairus' daughter or the widow's son at Nain or anyone else that Jesus raised from the dead during His ministry. This is because Jesus was, "the firstfruits of them that slept" (Acts 26:23; 1 Cor. 15:20).

Jesus was not the first person physically raised from the dead, but He was the first person begotten from the dead to never die again.

If these people were not actually resurrected until after Jesus' resurrection, when Matthew states they came out of their graves, then they could have been resurrected with their glorified bodies to never die again.

At any rate, these saints went into Jerusalem after Jesus was resurrected and they appeared to many people. We can only guess what effect this must have had on the people.

The resurrection of Jesus puts Christianity in a class all by itself. Many people have come and gone professing some revelation from God or new way of approaching God. But only Jesus has conquered death. This makes Him unique and elevates Him above the level of any other man who has ever walked on the earth.

The resurrection of Jesus is the ultimate proof of the accuracy of His doctrine.


** From Daily devotional @ AWMI.net

Educate yourself

Educate-Yourself
The Freedom of Knowledge, The Power of Thought ©

---

  Current News | Introduction | Colloidal Silver | Chemtrails | Sylphs | Emerging Diseases | Forbidden Cures | Ozone | Immunity Boosting | Nutrition | Tone Gen
Mind-Body Connection | Ozone | Bioelectrification | Story on Drugs | Vaccine Dangers | Cancer | Newsletter | New World Order | NWO News | Pam Schuffert
 James Casbolt | Phil Schneider | Al Bielek | Trevor Constable | Mind Control | Brice Taylor | Ted Gunderson | Metatech.org | Free Energy | Tim Hicks & Phil Ledoux |
Dr. Robert Bitzer | T. Lobsang Rampa | Ruth Drown | ZS Livingstone | David Brandt | Gary Wade | The CIA | Veterans Awaken | Tony Cartalucci in Thailand
Depleted Uranium | Dowsing | Police & Tasers | Rev. Moon | British Israel | Born Again Brainwashing | Amy Goodman Gatekeeper | Rethinking Noam Chomsky
Red Elk | Project Blue Beam | Bush Family & Nazis | Otto Skorzeny  | Insights on Aliens | Cell Towers | WiFi/Cell Phone Dangers | EMF Radiation News
CPS/DCF Tyranny | Adrenal Burnout | The Women Warriors | Orgone Adventures | Dr. John Coleman | Railroading Dr. Jeffrey MacDonald | Henry Makow |
Radio Interviews | Ten Best Sites | Metal Free Dentistry | Dr. Hulda Clark Books | Planet X Sequel | 'Undocumented Immigrants' | Donald Marshall & Cloning Station
War on Terror | Tavistock | U.S. Concentration Camps | FEMA | Aliens Are Coming! | Guiding Principles | Global Warming | Gang Stalking | Monoatomic Gold
Bill Cooper | Power of Thought | Spiritualism | Hope | Healing Thought Forms | Vanquish Fear | Prevent Alien/Demonic Attacks | Rockefeller File | War is a Racket
Letters | Sodom-LGBT Exp'd | Zeitgeist Refuted | Strawman Explained | Daily Blog | Global Warming | Hydrogen Peroxide | Protocols of Zion | Eric Jon Phelps Exposed |
  Israeli Soldier's Story | Home | Japan Radiation Hysteria | Agenda 21 | Swine Flu Hoax/Vaccine | Links | Contact Us/ E-mail | Jane Tripp Time Travel | Discussion
     
Want to Contact the Editor? First read this


Join the Educate-Yourself Discussion Forum 

All information posted on this web site is the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only. It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer of your choice for medical care and advice.

  

Remember when there were no cellphones?

Remember when there were no cellphones?
By Don Harkins

As her friend and editor for over a decade now, I have gown alongside Amy in her research on chemtrails, depleted uranium and radiation. There is zero doubt in our hearts and minds that Amy’s references are sound, her interpretation of data flawless and her intentions purely honorable and compassionate.

That means use of cell phones, WiFi, WiMax and RFID is not only suicide, but complicity in a "slow burn" form of mass murder. If second-hand cigarette smoke bothers you, how does it compare to second hand radiation? Well, it doesn’t. Using a cell phone in proximity to others only increases the intensity of the ambient levels of radiation that are omnipresent to support wireless personal communication networks. Where nonsmokers can remove themselves or the smoker from the room, noncellphoneusers (one word) cannot escape radiation by going to another room. In other words, everyone is bathing in dangerous levels of cellphone "smoke" whether you are "smoking" or not.

When the wireless age was growing in earnest in the late 90s, people kept telling Ingri and I, "You really need to get cell phones—they are so convenient."

We opted not to for the same reason we have never acquired a laptop computer: If we are away from our desk that means we are (temporarily) FREE!—free of the phone and free of the computer.

The next stage, by the early 00s, people began saying to us, "Don, Ingri, you really need to get cell phones so it will be more convenient for us to get ahold of you."

Now, when the subject of our having resisted carrying cell phones to this point comes up in conversation, people say, "You are so lucky."
It’s not luck—we just didn’t like the idea of being "on call" all the time and our lifestyles just didn’t evolve to include cell phones. We have only known for a couple years how deadly they are.

But, for cellphoneusers (one word), the novelty of cell phones has been replaced with addiction and the convenience has been replaced with enslavement. In that sense, we are lucky.

The three following comments represent the most common justifications people recite for using cell phones:
"But with my job, I have to have one."
"They are handy in an emergency."
"This way, the kids (the wife/husband/friends/business contacts) can always get ahold of me."
But consider these responses from noncellphoneusers:
"Is your job worth irradiating yourself and the world around you?"
"What did you do in an emergency BC (that’s "before cell phones")?"
"Are you sure that you are so darned important that you can’t just have people leave a message on a land line recorder and check messages now and then?"

And one bonus retort: "If an industry is using your addiction to wireless toys as a means to finance the erection of a communications infrustructure that intends to control all life on earth en route to destroying it, should you choose to buy its services?"
The truth is you can do your job without a cell phone—or find another one.
You can prepare in advance for emergencies like we used to.
And, it is true, we aren’t so important that people can’t wait a few minutes or a few hours to talk to us. (DWH)

Notes:
1. Interview with Dr. Eckel published by Schwabischen Post 12-07-06. Find interview at www.hese-project.org. See "The Cell Nucleus is Mutating."
2. " Neurological Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation," a paper presented by Dr. Lai to the Mobile Phones and Health Symposium, October 25-28, 1998, University of Vienna. Also "DNA Damage and Cell Phone Radiation," www.rfsafe.com, 11-02-05.
3. Cell Phones: Invisible Hazards in the Wireless Age, Dr. George Carlo and Martin Schram, Carroll & Graf Publishers, 2001, p.151.
4. " Mobile Telecommunications and Health—Summary of the ECOLOG study for T-Mobile, 2000," Find this summary at www.hese-project.org.
5. "Cell Phone Radiation Harms DNA, Study Claims," (Reuters) MSNBC, 12-04-04. Also "Mobile Phone Radiation Harms DNA," R. Moss, CPR News Bureau, 10-16-06.
6. "RF-Induced DNA Breaks Reported in China," Microwave News, 09-29-05. This report comes from the Zhejiang University School of Medicine.
7. "2.45 GHz radiofrequency fields alter gene expression in cultured human cells," Lee S et al, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, PubMed 16107253.
8 "Health Social Services and Housing Sub-Panel Telephone Mast Review," a public discussion by Dr. George Carlo, 2-26-07. Find this excellent dissertation at www. safewireless.org.
9. Few Americans know that cell phones have never been safety tested thanks to the FDA, which exempted cell phones from pre-market testing based on a "low power exclusion" rule.
10. "The American Cancer Society is Misleading the Public," Dr. George Carlo, 8-5-07. Find this statement at www.buergerwelle.com.
11. "Long-Term Mobile Phone Use Raises Brain Tumor Risk: Study," Reuters, 03-31-06. This research was conducted by the Swedish National Institute for Working Life whose scientists studied 905 people with malignant brain tumors to confirm a 240% increased risk of brain tumors after heavy mobile phone use.
12. "Cancer in Radar Technicians Exposed to RF/Microwave Radiation: Sentinel Episodes," Richter E. et al, Int. J. Occup Environ Health 6 (3):187-193, 2000.
13. "FCC Lives Large off Lobbyist Bribes," Capitol Hill Blue, 05-22-03, capitolhillblue.com.
14. "Health Social Services and Housing Sub-Panel Telephone Mast Review," public discussion by Dr. George Carlo, 2-26-07. Find this excellent dissertation at www. safewireless.org.
15. See www.c-a-r-e.org for information about groups affected by Lookout Mountain broadcast antennas.
16. For an excellent chart comparing biological effects at power density levels and a list of international exposure standards, go to: "Radio Wave Packet," Arthur Firstenberg, Cellular Phone Task Force, Sept 2001; also find this power density list at: "Analysis of Health and Environmental Effects of Proposed San Francisco Earthlink WiFi Network, Magda Havas, Ph.D, Trent University, May 2007.
17. Quote from letter by Norbert Hankin, chief environmental scientist with EPA’s Radiation Protection Division. This letter was received by EMR Network 7-16-02 and can be found at www.emrnetwork.org.
18. "Supreme Court Rebuffs Challenge to U.S. Tower Policy," Microwave News, Jan./Feb 2001.
EMR Network Petition For Inquiry To Consider Amendment of Parts 1 and 2 of the FCC’s Rules Concerning the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, September 25, 2001. See also FCC order to deny application for review filed by the EMR Network, adopted July 28, 2003.
19. Hicks, Onnink, Barber, Pennington v. Horvath Communications, Cause No.71C01-0107-CP St. Joseph Circuit Court, St Joseph County, Indiana.
20. "Some Unexpected Health Hazards Associated with Cell Tower Siting," Bill P.Curry, PhD., Cell Towers: Wireless Convenience or Environmental Hazard? The Berkshire-Litchfield Environmental Council, edited by B. Blake Levitt, 2000. See chapter 6.
21. Practical Guidelines to Protect Human Health Against Electromagnetic Radiation Emitted in Mobile Telephony, Summary June 2001, Miguel Muntane Condeminas, industrial engineer for Consulting Comunicacio i Disseny S.L, Barcelona, m.co-di@eic.ictnet.es. See Section 4.3.1 "US Embassy in Moscow Study."
22. See www.health-concerns.org. and www.safewireless.org. These sites provide a pathway to access Dr. Carlo’s Mobil Telephone Health Concerns Registry where people can report ill health effects from living near microwave transmitters or from the use of wireless devices.
23. "Electromagnetic, Fields, (EMF) Killing Fields," Arthur Firstenberg, The Ecologist, v. 34, n. 5, 6-10-2004.
24. "Study of the health of people living in the vicinity of mobile phone base stations: I. influences of distance and sex," R. Santini et al, Institut National des Sciences Appliquées—laboratoire de biochimie-pharmacologie, 2002.
25. "Cancer Risks from Microwaves Confirmed," Dr. Mae-Wan Ho, Institute of Science in Society press release, 5-24-07.
26. "The Microwave Syndrome—a preliminary study in Spain," Navarro E. et al, Biology and Medicine, 22 (2 &3) 161-169, 2003; also " The Microwave Syndrome—Further Aspects of a Spanish Study," Oberfeld G et al 2004, International Conference Proceedings, Kos, Greece 2004.
27. "Neurobehavioral Effects Among Inhabitants Around Mobile Phone Base Stations," Abdel-Rassoul et al, Neurotoxicology, 8-01-2006.
28. "Increase of Cancer Near Cell-Phone Transmitter Station," Wolf D. and Wolf, International Journal of Cancer Prevention 1-2, April 2004.
29. "Two in Three Believe Radiation from Phones Damaged their Health," Geoffrey Lean, 7-8-07 Independent on Sunday, U.K.
30. "Cancer Cluster at Phone Masts, " Times On Line, The Sunday Times, UK 4-22-07.
31. Report by Roland Stabenow, 9-21-06, head of cancer registry in Berlin.
32. "How Shall We Cope With the Increasing Amounts of Airborne Radiation?" Olle Johansson, Journal of the Australasian College of Environmental Medicine, Dec. 2006.
33. "Building Top Floors Closed After Brain Tumor Alert," Lisa Macnamara, The Australian, UK, 05-13-07. Read this report at www.rense.com.
34. "Cancer Strikes 12 Female Staffers," Tony Koch, Omega-News, 4-06-07.
35. Swedes Hit Hard By WiMax, 6-12-06, Reported by Swedish media about Swedish town Gotene. Hospital emergency room flooded with calls regarding headaches, difficulty breathing, blurry vision and heart problems. At least 5 people had to leave their homes.
36. "How WiMAX Works," E. Grabianowski and Marshal Brain, www. computer.howstuffworks.com
37. "250-foot Tower Raises New Bellevue Fears", John Hopkins, Cheektowaga Times, 8-09-2007; See also "Congress Approves Homeland Security Bill," Spencer Hsu, Washington Post 08-07-07.
38. Journal of Oncology Practice, Vol. 3, No. 2, March 2007: 79-86.
39. Robert Becker, The Body Electric, 1986.

---

Related

Cell Phones And Wireless Dangers - The Fundamentals (Oct 7, 2007)
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/wirelessandcellphonedangers05oct07.shtml

Cell Phone Towers Present Hidden Dangers Beyond Microwave Poisoning
http://educate-yourself.org/dc/dclatestonmctowerarrays25may02.shtml

  ===============================================

Conclusion

America must soon face its radiation cataclysm. The EMR Network says that millions of workers occupy worksites on a daily basis where operating antenna arrays are camouflaged and where no RF safety program is carried out. Thanks to shameless predatory advertising techniques, American youth are now literally addicted to "texting," watching TV and accessing the Internet on tiny wireless screens. These are the toys that keep cell towers and WiFi hot spots buzzing. A nation that requires compulsory mass irradiation to fuel its trivial entertainment needs is surely destined to have a sickly and short-lived population.

Right now, 11.7 million Americans have been diagnosed with cancer. Because humans can harbor cancer conditions for years before detection, additional millions of cancer victims are yet undiagnosed. The Journal of Oncology Practice predicts that, by 2020, there will be so many cancer cases in the U.S. that doctors may not be able to cope with their caseloads. The report concludes the nation could soon face a shortage of up to 4,000 cancer specialists.38

A recent CBS news series on the raging American cancer epidemic left viewers with the mindset that trainloads of federal cash must flow if we are to find the cancer answer. But the cancer cause now inundates our cities, roadways, schools, offices and homes. Any environmental stressor that jackhammers human cells at millions to billions of cycles per second is a cancer factor. Any wave-pollution that breaks the DNA and causes pre-cancerous micronuclei in human blood is a cancer factor. Logic tells us that there will be no "answer to cancer" until we eliminate the cancer factors.
Wireless communications radiation is to America today what DDT, thalidomide, dioxin, benzene, Agent Orange and asbestos were yesterday. Historically, the truth about the public health menace of extreme toxins is never told until thousands sicken and die.

Dr. Robert Becker, noted for decades of research on the effects of electromagnetic radiation, has warned: "Even if we survive the chemical and atomic threats to our existence, there is the strong possibility that increasing electropollution could set in motion irreversible changes leading to our extinction before we are even aware of them. All life pulsates in time to the earth and our artificial fields cause abnormal reactions in all organisms…These energies are too dangerous to entrust forever to politicians, military leaders and their lapdog researchers."39

Our mission to save the nation’s health and restore sanity in the wireless age seems daunting. The wireless juggernaut is an aggressive, mean machine. Federal regulators are clearly compromised and incompetent to protect the public health. Uninformed consumers dearly love their magic digital toys and don’t yet understand the connection between those toys and a national raging cancer epidemic that may consume us all.

Powerful economic interests have lied to us long enough. Americans need and deserve the facts. We need dialogue. Wireless radiation is a form of electronic trespass. America must decide whose rights are more important—idlers beaming death rays for gibberish or the elderly with pacemakers who are made ill by cell phone and tower radiation wherever they go. Must we all prematurely perish so that wireless enthusiasts can capture cell phone photos and instantly send them for processing via carcinogen express? Does a human being have the right to NOT be forcibly WiMAXED into a coffin, or do only wireless providers and their devotees have rights?

What can we do?
We can commit to join the growing radiation awareness movement and continue educating ourselves and others. We can employ digital and audio radiation detectors to help safeguard our personal health and to demonstrate the ceaseless brutality of ubiquitous wireless radiation which threatens the genetic integrity of future generations. We can promote emerging technologies that could make communications technologies safer.

We can demand that federal radiation exposure standards be updated and that wireless emissions from transmitters be drastically reduced. We can demand routine compliance testing at all transmitter sites. We can see to it that people living and working near transmitters be given opportunity to report their illnesses in national surveys. Proper epidemiological studies must be conducted and their results published and broadly disseminated. Federal communications law must be rewritten so that local jurisdictions can regain their right to consider health and environment when reviewing wireless siting applications.

Each of us can break the seductive, but oppressive wireless habit ourselves. We can play no game, use no wireless Internet system, make no trivial phone call that necessitates enlarging America’s dense forest of wireless transmitters.

If no one buys WiMAX-enabled devices and related services, the system will fail. Whenever possible, we can go back to the old-fashioned, corded phones and message machines which made yesteryear a far more healthy time. We can encourage others to contact us by land line only.
Can we enjoy a leisurely conversation knowing that an irradiated caller risks disease and disability for mindless chatter? What good is wireless convenience if it means being ultimately tethered to a hospital bed? We can teach our children that health is more important than passing convenience and instant gratification.

According to OSHA, no environment should be deliberately made hazardous. Backed by current scientific knowledge, we can refuse to work or shop in an environment which endangers our health. We can demand that megahertz and gigahertz cordless phones, walkie talkie radios, WLAN and WiFi systems be removed from schools, offices, hospitals and any public place where people are grossly irradiated without their informed consent. Second hand smoke is bad; second hand radiation is worse.

We wish to thank the courageous radiation victims interviewed for this report who have generously revealed the details of their personal suffering in order to warn others. Following their example, we must continue undaunted in the moral quest to protect the national health and restore the world to sanity before it is too late.

Meters and resources
The ElectroSmog Detector allows you to HEAR the RF/microwave pollution in your environment. (See ad on page 14 of the hardcopy edition of The IO).

The Trifield Meter ($130), produced by Alpha Lab, is used mainly to measure the milligauss of electromagnetic fields coming from 60 hertz sources. Use this digital meter to make sure your living and working spaces are under 2 milligauss. Alpha Lab’s Microwave Power Density Meter ($320) is a more sensitive digital microwave meter that will help you assess the kilohertz, megahertz and gigahertz radiation in our wireless environment. This easy-read meter measures microwave radiation in microwatts per cm2, allowing comparison of your readings to the 5 microwatts per cm2 used by the Russians to make our embassy staff sick. Remember, people inside the embassy reportedly received only about .01 microwatts per cm2. For more information, contact Alpha Lab Inc., 1280 South 300 West, Salt Lake City, Utah 84101; (800) 658-7030; www.trifield.com

For a list of more expensive professional meters available, go to: www.microwavenews.com. On the left side of the home page find a link called "Radiation Meters."

The Zap Checker: Alan Broadband produces radiation detection devices with models ranging in price from $159 to $2,800. The $159 model, while not giving detailed readings, is an extremely sensitive and sturdy instrument that gives an accurate dial read on whether or not radiation is present and its relative intensity. It lets you know when you are being irradiated and serves as an excellent tool to illustrate exposure levels to others. For more information, contact Alan Broadband 93 Arch St., Redwood City, California 94062; (888) 369-9627; www.zapchecker.com

Books
Cell Phones: Invisible Hazards in the Wireless Age, Dr. George Carlo and Martin Schram, Carroll & Graf Publishers, 2001.
Cellular Telephone Russian Roulette, Robert C. Kane, Vantage Press, 2001.
Cell Towers: Wireless Convenience or Environmental Hazard? The Berkshire-Litchfield Environmental Council, Edited by B. Blake Levitt, 2000. Order from Barnes and Noble.

Websites
These websites provide excellent information on all aspects of health and other issues relating to electromagnetic fields and radio frequency/microwave radiation.

www.buergerwelle.com This excellent German (but in English) site features RF/microwave radiation news from all over the world. The science keeps pouring in and this is where to find it, along with lots of human interest.
www.cprnewsbureau.org This is an excellent source of up-to-date news on wireless issues.
www.emrnetwork.org This site has superb resources organized by professionals with expertise in all facets of our RF/microwave radiation problem.
www.safewireless.org This site features Dr. Carlo’s Mobil Telephone Health Concerns Registry where people can report ill health effects from living near microwave transmitters or from the use of wireless devices. It also features great news reports.
www.microwavenews.com This is home to Microwave News, an excellent monthly publication. It offers cutting edge science reports, plus a great archive.
www.sageassociates.net This site provides valuable information on how to make homes and offices safer in the wireless age.

CAUTION:

 There are many devices on the market claiming to protect wireless users from radiation. These include: air tube headsets, ferrite bead clip-ons and an array of paste-ons advertised to cut down on thermal effects or deflect negative energy. Energy testing, kinesiology and meter readings indicate that these mitigation devices DO NOT adequately protect against the brutal force of near field microwave radiation. You can investigate the effectiveness of these devices by metering radiation levels while using them. If radiation pours from your "safe" headset, don’t bank your life on it. If practiced in the art of kinesiology, you can also "muscle test" the effectiveness of the radiation mitigation device. The human body becomes very weak when irradiated with any man-made frequency, especially microwaves. If a protective device is really working, you will not detect muscle weakness when using a wireless phone or gadget.

---

Apricot seed

Apricot Seeds & Laetrile

When Dad died back in 1996, I began my cancer journey. The first alternative cancer treatment which I discovered was Vitamin B₁₇, also known as Laetrile. I saw a video of a champion arm wrestler named Jason Vale who had been cured of cancer by eating the seeds from apples and apricots (which contain vitamin B₁₇) and read lots of good information on his website. Jason has since then become a friend of mine  and I included a section about him in my cancer book.

Of course, the Medical Mafia has mounted highly successful “scare” campaigns based on the fact that vitamin B₁₇ contains quantities of “deadly” cyanide. This is patently false. Studies show that vitamin B₁₇ is harmless to healthy tissue. 

 Here’s why: each molecule of B₁₇ contains one unit of hydrogen cyanide, one unit of benzaldehyde and two of glucose (sugar) tightly locked together. In order for the hydrogen cyanide to become dangerous it is first necessary to unlock the molecule to release it, a trick that can only be performed by an enzyme called beta-glucosidase, which is present all over the human body only in minute quantities, but in huge quantities at only one place: cancer cells. 

Thus the hydrogen cyanide is unlocked only at the cancer site with drastic results, which become utterly devastating to the cancer cells since the benzaldehyde unit unlocks at the same time. The cancer cells get a double whammy of cyanide and benzaldeyhde! Benzaldehyde is a deadly poison in its own right, but when it teams up with cyanide, the result is a poison 100 times more deadly than either in isolation. The cancer cells are literally obliterated!

But what about danger to the rest of the body’s cells? Another enzyme, rhodanese, always present in far larger quantities than the unlocking enzyme beta-glucosidase in healthy tissues, has the ability to completely break down both cyanide and benzaldehyde into a thiocyanate (a harmless substance) and salicylate (which is a pain killer similar to aspirin). Interestingly, malignant cancer cells contain no rhodanese at all, leaving them completely at the mercy of the two deadly poisons. 

This whole process is known as “selective toxicity,” since only the cancer cells are specifically targeted and destroyed. Amazing, huh?